||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 355 (Oct)
|| UKHL 40
||House of Lords
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Millett and Lord Scott of Foscote
||Robert Hartley QC and Sarah Palin (instructed by Cuff Roberts, Liverpool) for the claimant.
||Richard Spearman QC (instructed by Daniel Taylor) for the defendants.
||24 October 2002
Libel and slander - Damages - Assessment of damages - Jurisdiction of House of Lords.
The House of Lords had power to substitute for a sum of damages awarded by a jury such sum as appeared to the court to be proper instead of ordering a new trial. By s4 of the it was provided that the House of Lords might, on an appeal to it, 'determine what of right, and according to law and custom of this realm, ought to be done in the subject-matter of such appeal.' Moreover, a petition to the House of Lords routinely asked that the order of the Court of Appeal 'may be reviewed by Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, and that the said Order may be reversed, varied or altered or that your Petitioner may have such other relief in the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen, in Her Court of Parliament, may seem meet'. The House of Lords was not a creature of statute and in the absence of statutory or judicial restriction had inherent power to exercise any power vested in the Court of Appeal. It would be strange if the House of Lords, having jurisdiction to entertain the claimant's appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal, did not have power to substitute the order which it concluded the Court of Appeal should have made.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary