||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 184 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1407
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Lord Phillips MR, May and Laws LJJ
||Huw Davies (instructed by Stephenson Harwood) for the claimant.
||John Reeder QC and Rachel Toney (instructed by Shaw & Croft) for the defendant.
||14 October 2002
Contract - Mistake - Recission - Common mistake - Effect of common mistake - Mistake not rendering subject matter of contract essentially and radically different from that which had been believed by parties.
At common law a common mistake would not avoid a contract unless it rendered the subject matter of the contract essentially and radically different from the subject matter which the parties had believed to exist. There was no jurisdiction to grant recission of a contract on the ground of common mistake where that contract was valid and enforceable on ordinary principles of common law.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary