||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 164 (Jan)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Wall J, Mr P Dawson and Mr J Hougham
||Clive Sheldon (instructed by Battens, Crewkerne) for the employee.
||The employer appeared by its representative.
||18 October 2002
Employment - Transfer of undertakings - Continuity of employment - Unfair dismissal - Refusal of application to adjourn remedies hearing to allow another respondent to be joined in the proceedings - Correctness of decision - Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981, reg 5 - Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 1993, Sch 1, para 17(2)(a) - s 111(2)(a).
On an appeal against a decision of the employment tribunal by which it refused an application by the employee for an adjournment of proceedings to enable the employee to join another respondent to the proceedings, the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled that the tribunal had misdirected itself as to the meaning, inter alia, of para17(1) of Sch1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 1993 and accordingly allowed the appeal.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary