||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 288 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1453
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Aldous, Tuckey and Longmore LJJ
||James Mellor (instructed by DLA, Liverpool) for the claimant.
||Graham Shipley (instructed by Gorna & Co, Manchester) for the defendant.
||Jeremy Morgan (instructed by the Policy and Legal Department, Legal Services Commission) for the Legal Services Commission.
||21 October 2002
Legal Aid - Civil proceedings - Costs - Ability of court to award indemnity costs in favour of assisted person - Civil Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1989, reg 107B.
The effect of reg107B of the Civil Legal Aid (General) Regulations 1989 was to disapply the indemnity principle in cases involving legal aid. It was impossible to say that the rationale of an award of indemnity costs was that the successful party should not be out of pocket; rather the rationale would be that the unsuccessful party had misconducted himself (as in the instant case), or he had failed to beat an offer to settle, or had conducted a test case for the benefit of other litigants. From that it could be seen that it was not a principled objection to an award of an indemnity costs for the losing party to say that a legally aided litigant would not himself recover the difference between a standard and an indemnity costs order.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary