||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 322 (Oct)
||European Court of Human Rights
Judges Pellonpaa (President), Bratza, Pastor Ridreujo, Maruste, Pavlovschi and Garlicki, and Mrs F Elens-Ross (Section Registrar)
||Jean Gould of Tyndalwoods, Birmingham for the applicants.
||C Whomersley of the Foreign and Commonwealth Government for the respondent state.
||22 October 2002
Human rights - Right to family life - Homosexual - Discharge from armed forces on ground of sexual orientation - Legality of policy - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 8, 14, 41.
The European Court of Justice, following previous authority, held that the investigation of the applicants' sexual orientation and their discharge from the navy on the grounds of their homosexuality constituted direct interferences with their right to respect for their private lives which could not be justified on under art8(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights as being necessary in a democratic society, and found a breach of art8 accordingly. The applicants' art14 complaints did not give rise to any separate issue.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary