||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 427 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1534
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill LJ, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe and Sir Martin Nourse
||Michael Bloch QC and Michael Edenborough (instructed by Macfarlanes) for AB.
||James Mellor (instructed by Blair & Co) for BB.
||29 October 2002
Trade marks - Registration - Removal from register - Non-use - Entitlement of judge to interfere with hearing officer's decision - s 46.
A judge had been incorrect to interfere with the decision of a hearing officer in an application for revocation of a trade mark on the grounds of non-use under s46 of the where, although the officer's decision could have been expressed more clearly and another officer might have taken a different view, the view taken had not been one to which no reasonable officer could have come.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary