||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 281 (Oct)
||Michael Edenborough and Simon Malynicz (instructed by Medyckyj & Co) for the claimant.
||James Mellor (instructed by Bristows) for the defendant.
||18 October 2002
Trade mark - Appeal - Evidence - Further evidence - Admissibility of further evidence - CPR Pt 52.
The effect of the regime for appeal under CPR Pt52 was that the tribunal of first instance had all the relevant material before it to determine the issue. There could be no second attempt to make good deficiencies in the case by adducing further evidence which was available at first instance.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary