||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 73 (Nov)
|| EWCA Crim 2476
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Potter LJ, Butterfield J and Judge Paget QC
||Max von Santen-Pagava, solicitor advocate (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Simeon Hopkins (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||6 November 2002
Criminal evidence and procedure - Trial - Mode of trial - Offence triable either way - Failure to comply with statutory mode of trial procedure - Nullity of defendant's guilty plea - , s 51, Sch 3, para 7.
Where the mode of trial procedure required to be followed prior to the defendant's arraignment on a theft charge had not been followed, contrary to the requirements of para7 of Sch3 to the nor had active consideration been given to the question whether the defendant should be tried summarily or continue to be dealt with in the Crown Court, the proceedings which followed upon his plea of guilty were a nullity. His conviction and the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment would, accordingly, be quashed.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary