||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 408 (Nov)
||Stephen Knafler (instructed by Edward Duthie) for the claimant.
||Richard Clough (instructed by Edell Jones Lessers) for the first defendant.
||Clive Jones (instructed by Colin Wilson) for the second defendant.
||27 November 2002
Children - Child in need - Local authority - Accommodation - Duty of local authority - s 17.
The physical presence test, applied in the case of R (on the application of Stewart) v Wandsworth London BC, had been the correct test to be imposed in respect to the imposition of a duty under s17 of the . While there were no formal guidelines or arrangements adopted to assist authorities in such circumstances, where more than one authority was involved, co-operation was important. Furthermore, it was also important that authorities should not seek to pass responsibility for children on to other authorities. It was vital in cases involving children, that the needs of those children were given consideration, and that arguments between authorities did not hold up the provision of such services. It followed that attention needed to be given to a structured approach between authorities.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary