||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 54 (Dec)
|| EWHC 2584 (Admin)
Laws LJ and Field J
||David Perry (instructed by Law Enforcement and International Advisory Division) for the claimant.
||Michael Ivers and Mark O'Connor (instructed by Farrell Matthews & Weir) for the interested party.
||14 November 2002
Criminal law - Drug offence - International co-operation - Request for legal assistance - Jurisdiction of trial judge to order there to be no court proceedings concerning three defendants pursuant to request.
There was no jurisdiction by which a judge to make orders against parties who were not parties to the trial he was to conduct. Rather the judge's jurisdiction was to try the indictment that was before him. However, the judge plainly had jurisdiction to ensure that there was fairness in the course of the trial that was to proceed in front of him so that if he became satisfied that, in the course of the execution of the request, unfairness had arisen so far as the trial on indictment was concerned, then he had jurisdiction to take steps within that trial.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary