||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 423 (Nov)
|| EWCA Civ 1702
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Aldous, Dyson LJJ and Sir Denis Henry
||Peter Prescott QC and Lindsay Lane (instructed by Laytons, Guildford) for the claimants.
||Richard Arnold QC and Benet Brandreth (instructed by Wragge & Co) for the defendant.
||28 November 2002
Patents - Infringement - Indirect infringement - Patent claim specifying computer gaming system - Defendant supplying punters in UK with computer program making punters' computer a terminal for defendant's gaming system - Defendant's host computer held abroad - Relevance of location of host computer to claim for direct infringement - s 60(2).
The words 'to put the invention into effect' within s60(2) of the had to require the means to be intended to put the apparatus claimed into effect; thereby requiring the claimed apparatus to become effective. Accordingly, where in the instant case a defendant had supplied punters with a program which made their computers terminals for the defendant's gaming system, but the defendant's host computer was abroad, it was not a defence to a claim for indirect infringement of a patent under s60(2) of the Act to say that the host computer was located abroad, since the supply of the CD in the UK to the UK punter had been intended to put the invention into effect in the UK.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary