||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 239 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2263 (Comm)
||Brian Doctor QC and Richard Slade (instructed by Norton Rose) for the bank.
||Christopher Carr QC, David Owen and Susannah Jones (instructed by Middleton Potts) for the defendant.
||15 November 2002
Damages and compensation - Deceit - Measure of damages - Benefits to claimant from defendants' deceitful transaction - Credit to be given to defendants.
The question whether an alleged benefit should or should not be taken into account could not be determined by mere application of the 'but for' test. Where the wrongful conduct consisted of causing the victim to enter into a venture or transaction which he would not otherwise have entered into, and the wrongdoer alleged that the victim had received a subsequent benefit which he would not have received but for entering into the venture or transaction, the question to be asked was whether the receipt of the benefit was not merely a result of the venture or transaction, in an historical sense, but was part of the complex of obligations and benefits intrinsic, that was, belonging naturally to the venture or transaction.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary