||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 29 (Feb)
||Barry Singleton QC for the father.
||Timothy Scott and QC Kerstin Boyd for the mother.
||28 November 2002
Children - Family proceedings - Orders relating to children - Financial provision - Application by father to vary order - 1 - ss 8(5), 8(3A)
On the father's application to vary the order made pursuant to Sch1 to the the court ruled, inter alia, that notwithstanding the fact that the mother had failed to comply properly with her obligation to provide the required evidence of payments to the nanny, the father's reasonable protection came from his ability to apply to vary the order, the ceiling of 25,000 and the duty of the mother to account. Accordingly, the order would not be varied.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary