||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 415 (May)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Commissioner Howell QC, Ms G Mills and Miss D Whittingham
||The employee appeared in person.
||Nicholas Smith (instructed by Michelmores, Exeter) for the first respondent.
||Debbie Grennan (instructed by Wolferstans, Plymouth) for the second respondent.
||21 March 2002
Employment Appeal Tribunal - Practice - Appeals - Application to adjourn - Employee acting in person - Employee applying to adjourn appeal on day of full hearing - Case involving difficult point of law - Whether employee entitled to adjournment - Whether respondents entitled to their costs thrown away - Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, r 34.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal had no real alternative but to grant an application to adjourn an appeal made on the day of the full hearing by an appellant, who appeared in person notwithstanding that he had solicitors on the record, because the appeal involved a potentially difficult point of law that the appellant himself was not prepared to argue. However, whether it was the fault of the appellant himself or the fault of his solicitor, there had been unreasonable conduct in the way the application to adjourn had been dealt with, and, accordingly, the appellant would be ordered to pay the respondents' costs under r34 of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary