||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 68 (May)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judge Peter Clark, Ms N Amin and Mr T Thomas
||Anna Thomas (instructed by Pattinson & Brewer, Bristol) for the applicant.
||Ingrid Simler (instructed by Solicitor to the Department of Social Security) for the respondent.
||26 March 2002
Employment - Wages - Obligation to pay - Higher duty allowance - Applicant claiming back pay for performing duties of senior officer - Management refusing to make payments for entire period duties performed - Whether applicant entitled to payments - Whether management making unlawful deduction of wages - Whether complaint time-barred - s 23.
On an appeal against an employment tribunal's refusal to award the applicant back payments for higher duty allowance on the ground that the claim was time-barred, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that the tribunal had considered the question of reasonable practicability, and, in the absence of any lawful submission on behalf of the applicant, had concluded that he could not rely on the s23 proviso in the .
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary