||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 64 (Mar)
||Manjit Gill QC and Rambert de Mello (instructed by JM Wilson, Birmingham) for the claimant.
||Jason Coppel (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.
||7 March 2002
Human rights - Property - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions - Discrimination - Inhuman or degrading treatment - Claimant receiving unemployment benefits - Claimant aged under 25 - Claimant's benefits less than those paid to person over 25 - Whether lower payment incompatible with claimant's human rights - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 3, 8, 14 and First Protocol, art 1.
A claimant's challenge to the level of her payments of jobseeker's allowance and income support, which were lower since she was under the age of 25, was rejected by the Court, which determined that payments at a lower rate were not incompatible with the claimants rights under the European Convention on Human Rights.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary