||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 436 (Mar)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Tim Horlock QC and Christopher Kennedy (instructed by Slater Heelis Collier Littler) for the claimant.
||Kate Thirwall QC and Simon King (instructed by Vizards Wyeth) for the defendnat.
||27 March 2002
Negligence - Duty to take care - Existence of duty - Claimants bringing group action against defendant in respect of personal injuries caused by the spillage of hot drinks - Whether defendant negligent in dispensing and serving hot drinks at temperature it did - Whether defendant under duty to warn customers as to risk of injury - Whether drinks 'defective' - .
The court dismissed a group action in respect of personal injuries caused by the spillage of hot drinks sold by a well known fast food chain, holding that although customers would expect basic precautions to be taken against risks, that was not to the point that they should be denied the basic utility of being able to buy hot drinks to be consumed from a cup with the lid off.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary