||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 02 (Jul)
Rose LJ and Gibbs J
||John Hardy (instructed by Saunders & Co) for the applicant.
||James Hines (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||1 July 2002
Extradition - Committal - Validity - Applicant convicted in United States of America in absentia - Evidence of options by which conviction could be challenged - Whether conviction in contumacy - Sch 1, para 7(1) and (2).
The test of whether a conviction was in contumacy involved examining the nature of the conviction itself, and the extent to which it was regarded as final in the jurisdiction of the requesting country. That was a question of fact to be based on expert evidence about the law of the requesting country. The mere fact that the 'conviction' in question was recorded as a conviction until set aside was not determinative; nor was the fact that there were procedures open to the applicant to challenge the conviction.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary