||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 33 (Jul)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Keene LJ, Davis J and Judge Rivlin QC
||Martyn Levett (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Christopher Kerr (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||2 July 2002
Criminal law - Video recording of testimony - Witness not competent to give evidence - Witness with severe learning difficulties - Video interview of witness played to jury - Whether judge having erred in failing to exclude evidence of video - s 78.
A judge had been entitled to admit a video interview of a victim with learning difficulties in the case of a defendant charged with rape because other witnesses at trial had given evidence about the defendant's incapacity and had been available for cross-examination by the defence. It had also been open to the defence to request that a further video interview be conducted if it considered that the first video interview did not appropriately reflect the victim's demeanour.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary