||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 329 (Jul)
|| EWCA Crim 1880
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Buxton LJ, Crane and Henriques JJ
||Roger Thomas QC (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for H.
||Malcolm Swift QC and Bryan Cox (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for G.
||Simon Bourne-Arton QC and Caroline Wigin (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||23 July 2002
Criminal evidence - Sexual offence - Co-defendants - Co-defendants being tried separately in relation to allegations made by single complainant - Complainant's evidence at both trials being similar - Whether giving rise to concern that allegations fabricated - Whether convictions consequently unsafe.
Coincidental evidence given by the complainant in the separate trials of two defendants both charged with having raped and sexually abused her, whilst striking, could not of itself be a reason for the court to intervene and it was unpersuaded that the allegations in the two cases were sufficiently similar to give rise to a fear that one or other, or both, of them might have been fabricated or otherwise unreliable.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary