||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 89 (Aug)
|| EWCA Crim 2054
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Rose LJ, Colman and Stanley Burnton JJ
||Andrew Oldland (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Simon Laws (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||25 July 2002
Criminal law - Verdict - Inconsistent verdicts - Indecent assault - Defendant convicted on one count but acquitted on two counts of indecent assault alleged on single indictment - Whether verdicts inconsistent in circumstances.
In a case in which the conviction of a defendant depended on the jury accepting the evidence of the complainant and there were different counts alleging similar conduct, the fact that the jury acquitted on one or more counts did not of itself mean that the guilty verdict on one or more other counts was inconsistent with the acquittals. The defendant rather had to show that the verdicts were logically inconsistent and that the inconsistency was such as to demand interference by an appellate court.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary