||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 389 (Jul)
George Bartlett QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court
||Adam Tolley (instructed by Squire & Co) for the claimant.
||James Strachan (instructed by Georgina Surry) for the defendant.
||25 July 2002
Costs - Order for costs - Costs of appeal - Discretion - Ombudsman conceding arguable error in his determination - Beneficiary of determination not consenting to re-determination - Lack of consent causing claimant to issue judicial review proceedings - Proceedings compromised - Whether claimant entitled to recover costs from beneficiary or ombudsman.
On the claimant's application for costs arising out of a compromised action for judicial review of a decision by the defendant, it would not be appropriate, in the circumstances, to award costs against the individual responsible for the unnecessary continuation of proceedings. The court also commented that, having regard to its terms of reference, an ombudsman had no power to re-open a complaint once its award had been accepted.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary