||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 537 (Jul)
|| EWCA Civ 1349
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Schiemann and Sedley LJJ
||Clive Rawlings (instructed by Ashok Patel & Co) for the claimant.
||Elisabeth Laing (instructed by Tom Lewis-Brooke) for the defendants.
||31 July 2002
Education - School - Exclusion of pupil - Pupil being excluded from school - Appeal panel confirming exclusion - Appeal panel taking into account anonymous statements of fellow pupils - Whether appeal panel in error.
In appeal proceedings against a decision to exclude a pupil from school, a school's discipline committee and an appeal panel were, in principle, entitled to look at statements without their makers being called to give evidence, even if they were anonymous. Singular care was, however, required from tribunals which paid regard to such statements, and there could be cases where to give anonymous statements any weight would be so unfair to the pupil as to make it improper to admit them.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary