||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 498 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1630 (Admin)
Brooke LJ and Bell J
||Rhodri Thompson QC and Rabinder Singh QC (instructed by Richards Butler) for the claimants.
||David Anderson QC and Thomas De La Mare (instructed by the Solicitor for Customs and Excise) for Customs.
||31 July 2002
Customs and Excise - Duties - Imported goods - Goods imported from European Community - Customs operating intensive checks at entry ports - Customs requiring persons importing goods above a prescribed quantity to show goods not bought for commercial purposes - Whether Custom's procedures in accordance with Community law and European Convention on Human Rights - ss 141(b), 163 and 163A - Excise Duty (Personal Reliefs) Order 1992 - Council Directive EEC/92/12, arts 8, 9 - European Convention on Human Rights, art 6, First Protocol, art 1.
Policies and procedures adopted by HM Customs and Excise at Dover Hoverport in relation to the importation of goods bought in shops in the European Community having regard to the terms of the Excise Directive (EEC) 92-112 were unlawful in that the Excise Duty (Personal Reliefs) Order 1992 which was passed to enact that directive, and which laid down minimum indicate levels, wrongly reversed the burden of proof by requiring the individual to prove that he was not holding excise goods over the maximum allowed for commercial purposes, and because customs officers had to have reasonable grounds for suspecting an individual of having bought in goods for commercial purposes before they could lawfully stop and search him.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary