||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 467 (Jul)
|| EWCA Civ 1076
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Sir Andrew Morritt V-C, Rix and Jonathan Parker LJJ
||John Furber QC and William Hanbury (instructed by Gosschalks, Kingston-upon-Hull) for the claimant.
||Joseph Harper QC and Timothy Hartley (instructed by Thorpe & Co, Scarborough) for the defendants in both actions.
||30 July 2002
Estoppel - Proprietary estoppel - Conduct - Claimant's predecessor in title granting new lease at ground rent on expiry of lease - Claimant offering new lease at rack rent - Whether claimant estopped from offering new lease at rent other than ground rent.
A longstanding practice by a landlord of renewing leases at a ground rent could not, in itself, justify an expectation on the part of the tenants that that practice would continue in perpetuity. Something more was required before any question of unconscionability could arise. On the facts of the instant case, there was nothing sufficient to convert that practice into a representation or assurance sufficient to found a proprietary estoppel preventing a landlord from renewing a lease at a rack rent.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary