Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2002] All ER (D) 284 (Jul)
Court: Chancery Division
Judge:

Lloyd J

Representation John Martin QC and Paul Key (instructed by Paul J Wright & Associates, California) for the claimant.
  Richard Spearman QC and Martin Chamberlain (instructed by Taylor Joynson Garrett) for the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 18 July 2002

Catchwords

Practice - Summary judgment - Entitlement to summary judgment - Claimant bringing proceedings to enforce agreement - Defendant applying for summary judgment - Whether claimant having reasonable prospect of success - CPR Pt 24.

The Case

The defendant's application for summary judgment, pursuant to CPR Pt24, was allowed as there was nothing in the evidence that satisfied the court that a formal agreement was created between the claimant and defendant, without which there was no legally binding contract.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.