||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 112 (Jul)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Rix, Dyson LJJ and Wall J
||Stephen Bickford Smith (instructed by Gwilym Hughes & Partners, Wrexham) for the claimant.
||Richard Oughton (instructed by Oliver & Co, Chester) for the defendants.
||5 July 2002
Costs - Compromise - Offer made before hearing - Claimant making offer abandoning part of original claim - Claim being compromised on terms consistent with claimant's offer - Judge making no order as to costs - Whether judge correct - Whether judge precluded by authority from making order that one party pay a proportion of other party's costs.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Shirley v Caswell was not authority for the proposition that a judge could not make an order for costs on terms that a receiving party should receive only a proportion of his costs. It was plain that there was jurisdiction to order a paying party to pay only a proportion of a receiving party's costs, as CPR44.3(6)(a) specifically stated that an order for costs might be an order that a party paid a proportion of costs.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary