||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 145 (Jul)
Michael Supperstone QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court
||Nigel Ley (instructed by Freeman & Co, Manchester) for the defendant.
||William Baker (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution.
||10 July 2002
Magistrates - Evidence - Admission - Prosecution's expert evidence tendered outside time limit - Justices exercising discretion to allow prosecution to adduce expert evidence - Whether justices exercise of discretion unreasonable - Magistrates' Courts (Advance Notice of Expert Evidence) Rules 1997, rr 3 and 5.
In exercising their discretion, under r5 of the Magistrates' Courts (Advance Notice of Expert Evidence) Rules 1997, to permit the prosecution to adduce expert evidence even though it had been served in breach of r3, they had not acted unreasonably. If the defendant had considered he was at a disadvantage, his remedy was to apply for an adjournment of the hearing.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary