Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2002] All ER (D) 143 (Jan)
Court: Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Judge:

Lord Woolf CJ, Mitchell and Keith JJ

Representation Jimmy Vakil (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 22 January 2002

Catchwords

Sentencing - Robbery - Aggravating and mitigating features - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.

The Case

A sentence of four years' imprisonment imposed upon a defendant who pleaded guilty to robbery was considered, on appeal, to be manifestly excessive. A sentence of three years' imprisonment was substituted.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.