||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 143 (Jan)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Lord Woolf CJ, Mitchell and Keith JJ
||Jimmy Vakil (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||22 January 2002
Sentencing - Robbery - Aggravating and mitigating features - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
A sentence of four years' imprisonment imposed upon a defendant who pleaded guilty to robbery was considered, on appeal, to be manifestly excessive. A sentence of three years' imprisonment was substituted.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary