||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 302 (Jan)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Mummery, Buxton and Longmore LJJ
||Rhodri Thompson (instructed by DJ Freeman) for the claimant.
||Martin Howe QC (instructed by Mark Heath, Southampton) for the defendant.
||31 January 2002
European Community - Free movement of goods - Seafood - Health authority prohibiting cargo of shrimp from entering European Union on grounds of risk to public health - Claimant challenging authority's power to prohibit entry - Whether necessary to show actual risk to public health - Whether court able to review proportionality of decision - Council Directive (EC) 91/493 - Products of Animal Origin (Import and Export) Regulations 1996, reg 25(1).
It was not a necessary condition of taking any action against goods under reg25(1) of the Products of Animal Origin (Import and Export) Regulations 1996 that an actual risk to public health be shown. Furthermore, in a case involving decision making on a technical issue it was difficult to see how the court could assess the balance which the decision maker had struck, in order to judge an action's proportionality, without the benefit of technical advice.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary