||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 272 (Jan)
Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hutton, Lord Millett and Lord Rodger of Earlsferry
||29 January 2002
Human rights - Fair trial - Criminal charge - Length of proceedings - Whether breach of reasonable time requirement - European Convention on Human Rights, art 6.
In any case in which it was said that the reasonable time requirement had been violated in breach of art6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights, the first step was to consider the period of time which had elapsed. Unless the period was one which, on its face and without more, gave grounds for real concern it was almost certainly unnecessary to go further, since the Convention was directed not to departures from the ideal but to infringements of basic human rights. But if the period which had elapsed was one which, on its face and without more, gave ground for real concern it was necessary for the court to look into the detailed facts and circumstances of the particular case and for the contracting state to explain and justify any lapse of time which appeared to be excessive.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary