||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 303 (Jan)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Aldous, Robert Walker and Keene LJJ
||Jonathan Brock QC (instructed by Maitland Walker, Minehead) for the claimant.
||Kim Lewison QC and Martin Rodger (instructed by Masons) for the defendants.
||31 January 2002
Landlord and tenant - Lease - Option to renew - Claimant claiming entitlement to five year lease under option - Defendants granting claimant 20 year lease - Whether breach of contract - Whether claimant compromising right to tenancy by accepting 20 year lease.
On an appeal by a landlord against a judge's decision to award substantial damages for the failure to allow the exercise of an option to renew a lease, the court held that although the judge had correctly identified that certain terms could survive following a breach of contract, he had failed to distinguish between past rights, which could survive, and future rights, which could not. On the facts of the instant case, the claimant had compromised his rights to claim damages for breach of contract by agreeing to enter into a new lease and accordingly was only entitled to nominal damages.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary