||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 43 (Feb)
|| UKPC 3
Lord Slynn of Hadley, Lord Mustill, Lord Scott of Foscote, Sir Andrew Leggatt and Sir Philip Otton
||31 January 2002
Bahamas - Criminal evidence - Identity - Visual identification - Complainant giving police description shortly after commission of crime - Identification parade being held in which defendant played no part - Defendant unrepresented at trial - Neither description nor fact identification parade having being held disclosed by prosecution - Defendant being convicted - Whether conviction unsafe.
On the facts of the instant case, a failure by the prosecution to disclose details of the complainant's initial description of the defendant and the result of an initial identification parade in which the defendant had played no part amounted to a material irregularity, and accordingly the defendant's convictions would be quashed.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary