| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2002] All ER (D) 159 (Mar) |
| Court: | Technology and Construction Court |
| Judge: | Judge John Toulmin QC |
| Representation | Andrew Burr (instructed by McGrigor Donald & Co) for the claimant. |
| Peter Brunner (instructed by Mills & Co) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 31 January 2002 |
Catchwords
Contract - Construction - Term - Extent of work included in tender price - Whether claimant entitled to recover for additional work - Whether claimant entitled to recover for prolongation of contract - Whether defendant entitled to recover liquidated damages.
The Case
On a sub-contractor's claim in respect of a final account for work carried out in constructing an autoclave, which, so it argued, was not included in the tender price, the court ruled that, on the true construction of the contracts between the parties, the sub-contractor was entitled to additional payments.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary