||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 219 (Feb)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Bell J, Mr A Tuffin and Miss S Wilson
||Anthony Howard (instructed by Wilkinson Woodward, Halifax) for the complainants.
||Clare Grundy (instructed by Watsons, Darwen) for APL.
||15 January 2002
Employment - Continuity - Transfer of trade, business or undertaking - Contract for which complainants employed as drivers transferred to third party - Complainants employed by respondent - Respondent providing drivers to third party on sub-contract basis - Whether transfer of undertaking - Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981, regs 3, 5.
An employment tribunal was entitled to conclude that there had not been a transfer of an undertaking to the respondent for the purposes of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 when a contract for which the complainants were employed as drivers was transferred to a third party, and the complainants were employed by the respondent, which invoiced the third party for the cost of providing drivers and vehicles to enable it to fulfil its obligations under the contract.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary