||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 375 (Jan)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Commissioner Howell QC, Mr P Jacques and Mr T Thomas
||The appellant did not appear and was not represented.
||Gerard Clarke (instructed by the BBC Litigation Department) for the respondent.
||16 January 2002
Employment - Appeal - Procedure - Costs - Whether costs order made against appellant appropriate - Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993, r 34.
The respondent employer's application for costs against the appellant employee was allowed as it was right for the Employment Appeal Tribunal to exercise its exceptional power under r34 of the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 to award costs on the grounds that the two appeals were unreasonably launched and pursued.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary