Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2002] All ER (D) 274 (Jan)
Neutral Citation: [2002] EWCA Civ 35
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Auld, Robert Walker and Dyson LJJ

Representation Peter Wulwik (instructed by Blatchfords, Harrow) for the claimant.
  Neil Levy (instructed by Ralph & Co, Wadebridge) for the defendants.
Judgment Dates: 30 January 2002

Catchwords

Consumer credit - Extortionate credit bargain - Mortgage - Variable interest rate clause - Lender making concession as to terms of payment prior to execution of credit agreement - Credit agreement containing variable interest rate clause - Whether credit agreement properly executed - Whether extortionate credit bargain - ss 61, 138, 139.

The Case

Whilst the way in which a discretionary variation of interest rate clause operated was not a factor to be taken into account in determining whether a credit bargain was extortionate for the purposes of s138 of the the existence of such a clause and the failure to inform the borrower of it, particularly where the lender had a policy of operating the clause in a certain way, could be taken into consideration. However, on the facts of the instant case it could not be said that the credit bargain was extortionate.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.