||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 342 (Jan)
|| EWCA Crim 328
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Mantell LJ, Bennett J and Judge Stephens QC
||Paul O'Shea (instructed by W Brook & Co, Rotherham) for the offender.
||David Thomas (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General.
||31 January 2002
Sentencing - Robbery - Aggravating and mitigating features - Whether sentence unduly lenient.
A sentence of three years' imprisonment imposed upon an offender who pleaded guilty to robbery was considered, on a reference to the Court of Appeal by the Attorney General, to be unduly lenient. A sentence of four years' imprisonment was substituted.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary