||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 135 (Feb)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss P, Hale and Arden LJJ
||Mukhtiar Otwal (instructed by Kaim Todner) for the wife.
||Peter Jones (instructed by Lawrence Davies & Co) for the husband.
||12 February 2001
Contempt of court - Committal - Breach of injunction - Husband remanded in custody awaiting psychiatric reports - Judge sentencing husband to period of imprisonment on basis that further detention on remand not possible - Whether judge in error - s 35 - s 48.
Under s48 of the the power to remand an individual in custody, following committal for breach of an injunction, might be exercised to enable medical examination and reports to be obtained, with adjournments for three weeks at a time, and s35 of the which placed a time limit on the period of remand in custody, would not then apply. Section48 of the 1996 Act did not provide for an end date so that the court might continue to remand an individual in custody for as long as was necessary for reports to be obtained. In the instant case, the judge was not likely to have sentenced H if she had been aware that the opportunity to remand him further had existed, and accordingly, the sentence imposed would be set aside.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary