||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 354 (Feb)
||Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judge Pugsley, Mrs D Palmer and MR G Wright
||The appellant did not attend and was not represented.
||The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
||28 February 2001
Employment tribunal - Practice - Chairman sitting alone - Complaint including claim which statute requiring be considered by full employment tribunal - Whether chairman sitting alone prohibited from dismissing complaint for applicant's non-attendance - Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 1993, r 9(3), 13(8)(b) - s 4.
Where s4 of the required a full employment tribunal to hear a case, as in the case of s44 of the it was implicit that an order dismissing a claim for non-attendance under r9(3) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 1993 could not be made by a employment tribunal chairman sitting alone by virtue of r13(8)(b) of those Regulations.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary