Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2001] All ER (D) 392 (Feb)
Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal
Judge:

Lindsay J, Mrs M Prosser, Mr J Shrigley

Representation Richard Linskell of EEF for the appellant.
  James Richardson (instructed by Swinburne Jackson) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 21 February 2001

Catchwords

Employment - Dismissal - Dismissal by way of redundancy - Employment tribunal determining redundancy unfair - Whether redundancy unfair - Whether consultation with employee inadequate.

The Case

To consult a person after his redundancy had been decided upon was clearly manifestly unfair, however, consultation with a person after he had become potentially redundant was not a matter which represented just criticism of an employer's process.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.