Law, Probability and Risk
Journal
The journal publishes papers that deal with topics on the interface of law and probabilistic reasoning. These are interpreted broadly to include aspects relevant to the interpretation of scientific evidence, the assessment of uncertainty and the assessment of risk. The readership is primarily academic lawyers, mathematicians, statisticians and social scientists with interests in quantitative reasoning.
Non-evidence law topics include environmental issues, mass torts, causation, risk assessment, medical and pharmaceutical litigation involving the evaluation of epidemiological and bio-statistical evidence according to legal criteria.
The primary objective of the journal is to cover issues in law, which have a scientific element, with an emphasis on statistical and probabilistic issues and the assessment of risk.
SOURCE CURRENCY
1 March 2013, Volume 12, Issue 1
Citation: Law Probability and Risk (2013) 12 (1): 1
UPDATE INFORMATION
The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics
Beyond uniqueness: The birthday paradox, source attribution and individualization in forensic science testimony
The appropriateness of survival analysis for determining lost pay in discrimination cases: application of the 'Lost Chance' doctrine to Alexander v. Milwaukee
Properties of statistical tests appropriate for the analysis of data in disparate impact cases
Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism')
Pain and suffering quantified: Judge Weinstein's concept of similarity between cases
Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences
Non-evidence law topics include environmental issues, mass torts, causation, risk assessment, medical and pharmaceutical litigation involving the evaluation of epidemiological and bio-statistical evidence according to legal criteria.
The primary objective of the journal is to cover issues in law, which have a scientific element, with an emphasis on statistical and probabilistic issues and the assessment of risk.
SOURCE CURRENCY
1 March 2013, Volume 12, Issue 1
Citation: Law Probability and Risk (2013) 12 (1): 1
UPDATE INFORMATION
The Eighth International Conference on Forensic Inference and Statistics
Beyond uniqueness: The birthday paradox, source attribution and individualization in forensic science testimony
The appropriateness of survival analysis for determining lost pay in discrimination cases: application of the 'Lost Chance' doctrine to Alexander v. Milwaukee
Properties of statistical tests appropriate for the analysis of data in disparate impact cases
Reservations about likelihood ratios (and some other aspects of forensic 'Bayesianism')
Pain and suffering quantified: Judge Weinstein's concept of similarity between cases
Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences
Contributors
| Dr D. Lucy | Book reviews editor |
| Dr J. Franklin | Editor |
| Prof. C.G.G. Aitken | Editor-in-chief |
| Prof. F. Taroni | Editor |
| Prof. Jonathan Koehler | Editor |
| Prof. Joseph Gastwirth | Editor |
| Prof. Peter Tillers | Editor |

