||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 128 (Nov)
|| EWHC 2855 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division (Divisional Court)
Irwin LJ and Julian Knowles J
||Sam Thomas (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the appellant.
||Martyn Bowyer (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||16 November 2017
Criminal law - Harassment - Insanity
Criminal law Harassment. The defence of insanity was available for a defendant charged with an offence of harassment, contrary to the . Accordingly, the Divisional Court allowed the appellant's appeal by way of case stated against the decision of the Crown Court that, as a matter of law, the defence of insanity was not available for an offence of harassment.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases