||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 77 (Jul)
|| UKSC 47
Lady Hale DP, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes SCJJ
||Martin Chamberlain QC and Max Schaefer (instructed by Liberty) for the appellant.
||Nicholas Randall QC and Claire Darwin (instructed by Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP) for Innospec.
||Jason Coppel QC and Holly Stout (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State, as interested party.
||12 July 2017
Pension - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Sexual orientation
Pension Equal treatment in employment and occupation. The particularly para 18(1)(b), which authorised the restriction of payment of benefits based on service before the had come into force, was incompatible with and had to be disapplied. Accordingly, the Supreme Court declared that the appellant's husband, provided that he did not predecease him and that they remained married, was entitled to a spouse's pension calculated on the basis of all the years of the appellant's service with the respondent.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases