Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2017] All ER (D) 33 (Aug)
Neutral Citation: [2017] EWCA Civ 1190
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Gloster VP, Underhill and Simon LJJ

Representation Stephanie Harrison QC and Charlotte Kilroy (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Ltd) for the first appellant.
  Amanda Weston (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Ltd) for the second appellant.
  Robin Tam QC and Julie Anderson (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 31 July 2017

Catchwords

Immigration - Leave to remain - Indefinite leave to remain

The Case

Immigration Leave to remain. The appellants' challenge to the respondent Secretary of State's restricted leave policy governing the grant of leave to remain to asylum seekers whose claims had been refused because they had committed particularly serious offences or who were excluded from humanitarian protection, but whom it was impossible to remove, was rejected. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, further held that the appellants had properly been refused indefinite leave to remain.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.