||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 33 (Aug)
|| EWCA Civ 1190
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Gloster VP, Underhill and Simon LJJ
||Stephanie Harrison QC and Charlotte Kilroy (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Ltd) for the first appellant.
||Amanda Weston (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Ltd) for the second appellant.
|| Robin Tam QC and Julie Anderson (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
||31 July 2017
Immigration - Leave to remain - Indefinite leave to remain
Immigration Leave to remain. The appellants' challenge to the respondent Secretary of State's restricted leave policy governing the grant of leave to remain to asylum seekers whose claims had been refused because they had committed particularly serious offences or who were excluded from humanitarian protection, but whom it was impossible to remove, was rejected. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, further held that the appellants had properly been refused indefinite leave to remain.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases