Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2017] All ER (D) 01 (Sep)
Neutral Citation: [2017] EWCA Civ 1284
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge:

Rafferty, Irwin and Moylan LJJ

Representation Tim Buley (instructed by Elder Rahimi) for the appellant.
  Julie Anderson (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 23 August 2017

Catchwords

Immigration - Exclusion of immigrant deemed to be conducive to the public good - Deportation

The Case

Immigration Exclusion of immigrant deemed to be conducive to the public good. The appellant Iranian national's appeal against a decision of the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) upholding the decision of the Secretary of State on the basis that there would not be very significant obstacles to the appellant's integration into Iran was dismissed by the Court of Appeal, Civil Division. It had been clear that the UT had undertaken a broad evaluation when having determined whether there were very significant obstacles to the appellant's integration into Iran and had reached a decision which it had been entitled to reach.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.