||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 85 (Sep)
|| EWHC 2354 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Adam Wolanski (instructed by Farrer and Co) for the claimants.
||The defendants did not appear and were not represented.
||28 September 2016
Practice - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Injunction - Publication - First claimant being well-known English socialite - Second claimant being first claimant's fiancé - First claimant's iCloud account allegedly being hacked - Claimants obtaining ex parte interim injunction to restrain publication of photographs taken from iCloud account - Claimants applying for continuation of interim injunction and for injunction in broader terms - Whether application should be granted - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 8, 10.
Practice Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. The Queen's Bench Division, having considered s12 of the and having had regard to the competing rights in arts 8 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, granted an application by the claimants, Pippa Middleton and James Matthews, to continue an interim injunction to restrain publication of photographs taken from her iCloud account, which had been hacked. The terms of the injunction were broadened to include, not just photographs, but any other information which might have derived from the iCloud account.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases