||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 161 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2589 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
Martin Chamberlain QC sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court
||Chris Quinn (instructed by Osborne Clarke LLP) for the claimant.
|| Aidan Briggs (instructed by Goldstein Legal) for the defendants.
||21 October 2016
Contract - Unfair terms - Exemption clauses - Claimant franchisee entering into Sales Purchase Agreement (SPA) containing restrictions - Claimant failing to honour payments on basis that defendant breaching restrictions - Whether claimant entitled to withhold payment on basis of breach of covenants.
Contract Unfair terms. The Queen's Bench Division held that the claimant Rush hairdressing salon had been entitled to withhold certain deferred consideration under a Sales Purchase Agreement (the SPA) as the defendant had been in breach of certain restrictive clauses in the SPA.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases