||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 102 (Dec)
|| EWCA Civ 1296
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Kitchin and Floyd LJJ
||Tom Mitcheson QC (instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) for the applicant.
||Daniel Alexander QC and Mark Chacksfield (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) for the respondent.
||16 December 2016
Patent - Application - Permission to appeal - Defendant company being patentee of European Patent relating to delivery of drug to patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma - Claimant seeking declaration patent invalid - Defendant applying to introduce new claims - Application dismissed - Defendant seeking permission to appeal - Whether application to be allowed - CPR 52.
Patent Application. The Court of Appeal in refusing permission to appeal in a patents case, held that the technical complexity of the background of a case was no longer a factor which trial judges should take into account in favour of granting permission to appeal.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases