||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 233 (Nov)
|| EWHC 3382 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
||Caoilfhionn Gallagher and Sam Jacobs (instructed by Hopkin Murray Beskine Ltd) for the claimants.
|| Clive Sheldon QC and Simon Pritchard (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Secretary of State.
|| Dan Squires (instructed by the Equality and Human Rights Commission) for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, as intervener.
||26 November 2015
Social Security - Benefit - Benefits cap - Claimant carers challenging legislation providing benefit cap on those receiving carer's allowance - Whether legislation being irrational or disproportionate - Whether legislation constituting unlawful discrimination - Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, - uropean Convention on Human Rights, arts 8, 14, First Protocol, art 1.
Social Security Benefit. The Administrative Court held that the failure to exempt at least individual family carers from the benefit cap on some who received carer's allowance, under Pt 8A of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, , was unlawful because it amounted to indirect discrimination which was not objectively justifiable. However, the Regulations were not unlawful as disproportionate or unreasonable.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases